Reacties op: Citizen journalism at the World Audio Festival 2006 http://melodiefabriek.nl/2006/11/citizen-journalism-at-the-world-audio-festival-2006/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=citizen-journalism-at-the-world-audio-festival-2006 media creatie & publicatie Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:17:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Door: chake http://melodiefabriek.nl/2006/11/citizen-journalism-at-the-world-audio-festival-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-259469 chake Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:18:37 +0000 http://melodiefabriek.nl/2006/11/11/citizen-journalism-at-the-world-audio-festival-2006/#comment-259469 comment5 <a href="http://where-is-the-fuel-filter-located.koslutaredo.com/personal-home-videos-free-work-at-home-jobs-work-at-home-legitimate-work-at-home-opportunities-homes-for-sale" rel="nofollow">rickey smiley</a> comment5 rickey smiley

]]> Door: Marco Raaphorst http://melodiefabriek.nl/2006/11/citizen-journalism-at-the-world-audio-festival-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-22043 Marco Raaphorst Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:25:16 +0000 http://melodiefabriek.nl/2006/11/11/citizen-journalism-at-the-world-audio-festival-2006/#comment-22043 I think the Creative Commons BY-SA License or maybe BY-SA-NC would be appropriate for non-commercial broadcasting. The main point is: it's an investment for the future. All old productions have only broadcast-rights for like 2 or 3 viewings on television. That's totally unbelievable these days, but still: nothing has changed (yet). Production companies are still working for large sums of money and restricting everything with the same old copyright we've had for years. Acting like the internet doesn't exists at all... I think the Creative Commons BY-SA License or maybe BY-SA-NC would be appropriate for non-commercial broadcasting.

The main point is: it’s an investment for the future. All old productions have only broadcast-rights for like 2 or 3 viewings on television. That’s totally unbelievable these days, but still: nothing has changed (yet). Production companies are still working for large sums of money and restricting everything with the same old copyright we’ve had for years. Acting like the internet doesn’t exists at all…

]]> Door: gurdonark http://melodiefabriek.nl/2006/11/citizen-journalism-at-the-world-audio-festival-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-22035 gurdonark Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:35:15 +0000 http://melodiefabriek.nl/2006/11/11/citizen-journalism-at-the-world-audio-festival-2006/#comment-22035 You'd think that people would begin to understand that if one is going to fund something with public money, then some public license is appropriate. Yet some folks are still mired in old-fashioned thinking. It's not that I mind copyright--it's fine for the state to create this protection for artists. But it's more than fine--certainly desirable--for the state (or people in the private market) to demand some compromises in return for funding things like this. It would be cool, though, if all such festivals were Creative Commons/GNU/open source in orientation. Imagine how much great music could be placed for easy access by the public. The artists could benefit directly from the funding, and the improvements in audio technology means that no longer would such a venture necessarily be lesser in sound quality. You’d think that people would begin to understand that if one is going to fund something with public money, then some public license is appropriate. Yet some folks are still mired in old-fashioned thinking.

It’s not that I mind copyright–it’s fine for the state to create this protection for artists. But it’s more than fine–certainly desirable–for the state (or people in the private market) to demand some compromises in return for funding things like this.

It would be cool, though, if all such festivals were Creative Commons/GNU/open source in orientation. Imagine how much great music
could be placed for easy access by the public. The artists could benefit directly from the funding, and the improvements in audio technology means that no longer would such a venture necessarily be lesser in sound quality.

]]>