Ja ik heb de Waves bijbel moeten leren en daardoor goed in de vingers gekregen hoe het werkt. De lay out verbergt veel van de functionaliteit. De izotope is nogal robuust en visueel. Waves is licht en doeltreffend. Het is even wennen maar dan heb je ook wat!

Ik zal is kijken naar de reason mastering tools.

Izotope was me mastering tool tot dat ik Waves platinum in em handen kreeg. (via school) Fl studio 8 heeft een grote slag gemaakt door externe (sampler)tools mee te leveren. SliceX is een heel erg goede tool die ik veel gebruik naast Kontakt. De thor (whats in the name ) heb ik wel even onderhanden genomen voor een paar workshops die ik gegeven heb en was best onder de indruk. Reason is en blijft een sterk staaltje software maar limiteerd zich in mijn ogen nog altijd te veel door door de vst loze aanpak. Maar als rewire kan ik de voordelen idd best inzien.

@thorltd: veel gehoorde klacht. Ik vind Reason 4 wel echt te gek. Sequencer is ook beter geworden en ReGroove is geniaal. Geen enkele andere applicatie kan dat. Bovendien vind ik de Reason mastering effecten helemaal top. Zelfs beter dan iZoptope Ozone 3 die ik voor het masteren gebruik.

A few years ago I applied for Interaction Designer at the Propellerheads. I have had the honour of visiting their headquaters in Stockholm. It was a very nice experience, to meet my heroes in real life, an visit the place where the magic comes from.

I think it is a very thin line between strong vision and stubborness. In my opinion the limeted set of devices in Reason forces you to use them creative. I strongly agree with PH to ignore the people shouting out for VST support. Compare reason to a box of lego: you can use the bricks to create anythinkg making use of what you have.

For me, reason is a box of legos. I am still learning and discovering new ways of using it all together.

But at some point you should be able to reconsidder choices. For instance, the rack metaphor. It still is a strong one, but in my opinion it is starting to fail. The metaphor inherits the limits we have in the physical world of space. I have seen some great examples of reason documents, stockpiling 100s of devices. In that case it becomes harder and harder respond in a creative manner, it is obstructed by lack of wholesight. During my interview I made it clear I think sticking to the rack metaphor forever is stubborn…

Then the eternal audio question. Im a reason fan and also a guitarplayer. I WANT to record my guitar…But I’m not sure it should be IN Reason…It could be an awesome propellerhead-approached tool next to it as well. Rewired into reason. Just like the usage of Lego Technic with your other Legos. Clogging it all in one just isn’t the way.

During the interview I was confronted with a few dillema’s the PHeads are struggling with. And i experienced the struggle as well. It is hard to keep it simple and flexible at the same time…

In case you wonder: I didn’t get the job ;) I guess I was to stubborn on removing the rack metaphor and find a new way of organizing your devices. Hehe :)

There’s no perfect audio tool at the moment. But I could create one on paper for sure. I record while holding a guitar in my hands. The app should be super simple, a large button for record and then digging deeper and deeper…

You understand just what I mean. I play the mountain dulcimer, which is so simple that a child Puck’s age could play tunes with an hour’s lesson, and yet it offers complexity and rich exploration as one progresses. I want audio applications to work like that.

Ableton Live is a great example. It’s fine to release a Live DAW, but they could easily have released a 3.0 Ultra with the simple innovations, at a reduced costs. It is amusing that when Ableton came out, everyone raved that it is populist and easy, and now people rave that it is a specialist’s tool.

I am always on the hunt for the DAW that does not act like a DAW. I thought that I had found it in Bram Bos’ Tunafish, a DAW/sequencer which eliminates all features but the most essential, and yet is a VST platform. Yet thus far, it has not delivered the simple experience I seek.

I use instead a very simple set-up, based on Sawcutter 2.0, a four-voice softsynth which samples from wave files of up to 7 seconds. It is so simple to use it’s amusing–and yet, like a guitar, I am always learning some new sound or fx I can create with it.

That’s the problem in all creative ventures–practice something one knows, to learn how to “really do it”, or expand horizons, and yet miss the wisdom of learning simple things well.

Ableton Live used to be simple. I think ’till version 3, audio only but you could slave Reason to it. That was super. But then they added MIDI, then they added video and now it’s no longer a quick audio application but a DAW.

If Ableton would build a simple audio tool, like Live 3, with a couple of the improved effects and stable… killer. The workflow of Live is really something. But it went from basic to a complicated DAW. Propellerheads are more focussed, so they never tried to add something to Reason which conflicts with the concept. I admire that.